<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 136 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Dy. CIT (A)&#039;s order and directed a fresh disposal of the matter. Emphasizing the necessity of verifying the service of notice under section 148 and allowing both sides to present fresh evidence, the Tribunal called for a remand report from the assessing officer to ensure compliance with legal procedures and proper administration of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:36:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 136 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Dy. CIT (A)&#039;s order and directed a fresh disposal of the matter. Emphasizing the necessity of verifying the service of notice under section 148 and allowing both sides to present fresh evidence, the Tribunal called for a remand report from the assessing officer to ensure compliance with legal procedures and proper administration of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>