<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 145 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65828</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 24,000 and Rs. 27,000 as income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had appropriately considered the evidence provided by the assessee, including the presence of cows in the ladies&#039; household, and concluded that the source of the credits was satisfactorily explained. As a result, the appeals by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:33:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 145 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65828</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 24,000 and Rs. 27,000 as income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had appropriately considered the evidence provided by the assessee, including the presence of cows in the ladies&#039; household, and concluded that the source of the credits was satisfactorily explained. As a result, the appeals by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>