<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 130 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65815</link>
    <description>Silver utensils capable of use as a complete dinner set were treated as personal effects held for domestic use by the assessee, family members, and guests. On that factual basis, the Tribunal held that they were not acquired as investment assets and therefore fell outside the definition of capital asset under section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As a result, capital gains computation did not arise and the addition towards capital gains was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:10:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 130 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65815</link>
      <description>Silver utensils capable of use as a complete dinner set were treated as personal effects held for domestic use by the assessee, family members, and guests. On that factual basis, the Tribunal held that they were not acquired as investment assets and therefore fell outside the definition of capital asset under section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As a result, capital gains computation did not arise and the addition towards capital gains was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>