<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 170 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65807</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Rs. 52,360 under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the provision did not apply as there was no evidence of unexplained investments amounting to the disputed sum, rendering the presumption under section 69 inapplicable. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the added amount upheld by the AAC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:56:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 170 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65807</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Rs. 52,360 under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the provision did not apply as there was no evidence of unexplained investments amounting to the disputed sum, rendering the presumption under section 69 inapplicable. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the added amount upheld by the AAC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>