<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (2) TMI 132 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65755</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a capital gains assessment dispute between an individual and a firm. Despite the property being in the individual&#039;s name, the partnership deed indicated it was considered the firm&#039;s asset. The Tribunal emphasized that property brought into a firm is no longer the individual&#039;s exclusive property, supported by the partners&#039; conduct. Consequently, the capital gains were deemed assessable in the firm&#039;s total income, leading to their removal from the individual&#039;s total income. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, with Section 52 and the nature of capital gains not requiring consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:07:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (2) TMI 132 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65755</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a capital gains assessment dispute between an individual and a firm. Despite the property being in the individual&#039;s name, the partnership deed indicated it was considered the firm&#039;s asset. The Tribunal emphasized that property brought into a firm is no longer the individual&#039;s exclusive property, supported by the partners&#039; conduct. Consequently, the capital gains were deemed assessable in the firm&#039;s total income, leading to their removal from the individual&#039;s total income. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, with Section 52 and the nature of capital gains not requiring consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>