<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 154 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65752</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the assessee, granting the deduction-relief under sections 80HH and 80J of the IT Act for the assessment years 1975-76 to 1977-78. The ITAT found that the assessee&#039;s actions, including the shift to a new location, increased production range, investment in new machinery, and resulting profits, met the criteria for establishing a new industrial undertaking as required by the Act. The decision emphasized the need for substantial fresh capital investment, employment of labor, production of articles, clear profit attribution, and a distinct identity for the industrial unit to qualify for the statutory benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:49:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 154 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65752</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of the assessee, granting the deduction-relief under sections 80HH and 80J of the IT Act for the assessment years 1975-76 to 1977-78. The ITAT found that the assessee&#039;s actions, including the shift to a new location, increased production range, investment in new machinery, and resulting profits, met the criteria for establishing a new industrial undertaking as required by the Act. The decision emphasized the need for substantial fresh capital investment, employment of labor, production of articles, clear profit attribution, and a distinct identity for the industrial unit to qualify for the statutory benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>