<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (1) TMI 94 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65696</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, affirming the Income-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to impose penalties under the amended Section 274. It found deliberate concealment of income by the assessee and reduced penalties to the minimum imposable under the law. The Tribunal directed the Income-tax Officer to recalculate penalties and refund any excess amounts, noting that penalties exceeding the prescribed maximum for one assessment year rendered the order void ab initio.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:26:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (1) TMI 94 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65696</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, affirming the Income-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to impose penalties under the amended Section 274. It found deliberate concealment of income by the assessee and reduced penalties to the minimum imposable under the law. The Tribunal directed the Income-tax Officer to recalculate penalties and refund any excess amounts, noting that penalties exceeding the prescribed maximum for one assessment year rendered the order void ab initio.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>