<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 180 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65667</link>
    <description>40% of the incentive bonus received by a Life Insurance Corporation Development Officer was held allowable as deduction. The Tribunal noted that the deduction had already been accepted in earlier Tribunal decisions and was supported by the Gauhati High Court, and it followed that settled view. The relief granted by the first appellate authority was therefore upheld, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:32:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 180 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65667</link>
      <description>40% of the incentive bonus received by a Life Insurance Corporation Development Officer was held allowable as deduction. The Tribunal noted that the deduction had already been accepted in earlier Tribunal decisions and was supported by the Gauhati High Court, and it followed that settled view. The relief granted by the first appellate authority was therefore upheld, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>