<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 179 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of lease rent as a business expenditure, finding the transaction genuine with proper documentation. Relief was granted on the undervaluation of closing stock based on previous orders. The Tribunal supported the allowance of 100% depreciation on equipment and the full claim under Section 80HHC. Disallowances on certain payments were remanded for reconsideration. The Tribunal upheld relief on sales tax deposit, foreign travel expenditure, and agricultural produce maintenance costs. Some issues were sent back for fresh examination by the AO, ensuring adherence to legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:29:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 179 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of lease rent as a business expenditure, finding the transaction genuine with proper documentation. Relief was granted on the undervaluation of closing stock based on previous orders. The Tribunal supported the allowance of 100% depreciation on equipment and the full claim under Section 80HHC. Disallowances on certain payments were remanded for reconsideration. The Tribunal upheld relief on sales tax deposit, foreign travel expenditure, and agricultural produce maintenance costs. Some issues were sent back for fresh examination by the AO, ensuring adherence to legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>