https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65655 The Tribunal concluded that the claim of the assessee as Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) was not proven. The protective assessments in the status of Association of Persons (AOP) were canceled, and the income was to be substantively assessed in the hands of the individuals, Sri K.K. Barkataky and Sri Ajit Barkataky. The appeals filed by the department were allowed. en-us Thu, 05 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:59:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65655 The Tribunal concluded that the claim of the assessee as Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) was not proven. The protective assessments in the status of Association of Persons (AOP) were canceled, and the income was to be substantively assessed in the hands of the individuals, Sri K.K. Barkataky and Sri Ajit Barkataky. The appeals filed by the department were allowed. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 05 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65655