<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 94 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings under section 147(a) and reinstated the addition of Rs. 5,04,127 as undisclosed income. The Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision was overturned, with the Tribunal determining that the original ITO had not formed a definitive opinion on the stock difference, justifying the reassessment based on the assessee&#039;s failure to fully disclose material facts necessary for assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:04:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 94 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings under section 147(a) and reinstated the addition of Rs. 5,04,127 as undisclosed income. The Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision was overturned, with the Tribunal determining that the original ITO had not formed a definitive opinion on the stock difference, justifying the reassessment based on the assessee&#039;s failure to fully disclose material facts necessary for assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>