<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 118 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65636</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263 but modified the directions regarding the bifurcation of profits. The appeal of the assessee-company was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with a direction to the CIT to reconsider the matter in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:49:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 118 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65636</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263 but modified the directions regarding the bifurcation of profits. The appeal of the assessee-company was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with a direction to the CIT to reconsider the matter in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>