<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 148 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65621</link>
    <description>A final, unchallenged appellate order binds the parties, and the assessing authority giving effect to that order must confine itself to the specific directions already ? No, English only. The assessing authority under the Wealth-tax Act could not entertain a fresh claim at the recomputation stage because the issue had not been raised in the original assessment or in the final appellate order. The new point was therefore barred, and rejection of the claim was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:18:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 148 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65621</link>
      <description>A final, unchallenged appellate order binds the parties, and the assessing authority giving effect to that order must confine itself to the specific directions already ? No, English only. The assessing authority under the Wealth-tax Act could not entertain a fresh claim at the recomputation stage because the issue had not been raised in the original assessment or in the final appellate order. The new point was therefore barred, and rejection of the claim was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>