<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 134 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65605</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the family settlement and accepting the assessee&#039;s claim of shared ownership in the property under Mohammedan Law. The issues concerning the extent of investment and treatment of advance rent and credit purchases were remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification and fresh disposal to ensure accurate income-tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 134 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65605</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the family settlement and accepting the assessee&#039;s claim of shared ownership in the property under Mohammedan Law. The issues concerning the extent of investment and treatment of advance rent and credit purchases were remanded to the Assessing Officer for further verification and fresh disposal to ensure accurate income-tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>