<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 169 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65604</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed the present C.I.T. (Appeals) to verify if the predecessor C.I.T. (Appeals) order had become final. If so, the payment of Rs. 8700 should be treated as advance tax, allowing interest under section 214. The Assessing Officer must comply with higher authorities&#039; directions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter to the C.I.T. (Appeals) for fresh disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:32:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 169 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65604</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed the present C.I.T. (Appeals) to verify if the predecessor C.I.T. (Appeals) order had become final. If so, the payment of Rs. 8700 should be treated as advance tax, allowing interest under section 214. The Assessing Officer must comply with higher authorities&#039; directions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, remanding the matter to the C.I.T. (Appeals) for fresh disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>