<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 135 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65602</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals by the assessees and allowed the appeal by the revenue in full. It concluded that the entire income from the house property should be assessed in the hands of Shri G. Sharma Barua, as the partnership was a sham and the minors did not acquire any rights in the property. The Tribunal directed the AAC to reconsider the issue of charging interest under Sections 139(8) and 217(1A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 135 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65602</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals by the assessees and allowed the appeal by the revenue in full. It concluded that the entire income from the house property should be assessed in the hands of Shri G. Sharma Barua, as the partnership was a sham and the minors did not acquire any rights in the property. The Tribunal directed the AAC to reconsider the issue of charging interest under Sections 139(8) and 217(1A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>