<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 287 - ITAT DELHI-J</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, determining that the notice under section 143(2) was not validly served within the prescribed 12-month period, as the service by affixture did not comply with the procedural requirements of the CPC. Consequently, the assessment based on the invalid notice was deemed null and void, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 287 - ITAT DELHI-J</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, determining that the notice under section 143(2) was not validly served within the prescribed 12-month period, as the service by affixture did not comply with the procedural requirements of the CPC. Consequently, the assessment based on the invalid notice was deemed null and void, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>