<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 239 - ITAT DELHI-I</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the assessment order to the file of the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, emphasizing compliance with principles of natural justice. The Tribunal concluded that the assessment completed within the extended time allowed under Explanation 1(ii) to section 158BE, despite the invalidation of the special audit order. Both appeals filed by the assessee and the revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 239 - ITAT DELHI-I</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the assessment order to the file of the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, emphasizing compliance with principles of natural justice. The Tribunal concluded that the assessment completed within the extended time allowed under Explanation 1(ii) to section 158BE, despite the invalidation of the special audit order. Both appeals filed by the assessee and the revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>