<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 55 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65550</link>
    <description>Arm&#039;s length remuneration to the Indian agent exhausted any further profit attribution to the foreign enterprise where country-wise accounts showed no additional India-linked profit. The assessee&#039;s agent was paid commission at 15% for soliciting and collecting airtime advertisement revenue, and the transfer pricing material accepted that rate as arm&#039;s length. On the maintained India allocation of revenues and expenses, and in the absence of further attributable profit, estimation of income by applying a flat percentage of gross receipts was unsustainable. CBDT Circular No. 742 was held inapplicable on these facts because country-wise accounts were maintained, and no additional taxable income survived beyond the arm&#039;s length commission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 20:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 55 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65550</link>
      <description>Arm&#039;s length remuneration to the Indian agent exhausted any further profit attribution to the foreign enterprise where country-wise accounts showed no additional India-linked profit. The assessee&#039;s agent was paid commission at 15% for soliciting and collecting airtime advertisement revenue, and the transfer pricing material accepted that rate as arm&#039;s length. On the maintained India allocation of revenues and expenses, and in the absence of further attributable profit, estimation of income by applying a flat percentage of gross receipts was unsustainable. CBDT Circular No. 742 was held inapplicable on these facts because country-wise accounts were maintained, and no additional taxable income survived beyond the arm&#039;s length commission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>