<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 83 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65549</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding interest under s. 132B(4)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that interest should be granted as the seized cash exceeded the lawful tax liability, emphasizing the need to compensate the assessee for the excess cash retained without legal liability. The AO was directed to compute the interest payable to the assessee. The appeal on interest under s. 244A(1)(b) was not pressed and dismissed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:23:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 83 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65549</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding interest under s. 132B(4)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that interest should be granted as the seized cash exceeded the lawful tax liability, emphasizing the need to compensate the assessee for the excess cash retained without legal liability. The AO was directed to compute the interest payable to the assessee. The appeal on interest under s. 244A(1)(b) was not pressed and dismissed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>