<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 329 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of a penalty of Rs. 35,51,000 imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that no concealment of income occurred as the assessed income was nil after adjusting losses, and there was no deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the revised computation of income was filed in good faith to correct inadvertent errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 329 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of a penalty of Rs. 35,51,000 imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that no concealment of income occurred as the assessed income was nil after adjusting losses, and there was no deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the revised computation of income was filed in good faith to correct inadvertent errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>