<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 244 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65540</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty order as not barred by limitation under Section 275(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, but deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) due to the assessee&#039;s claim being made in good faith and all relevant particulars being disclosed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 244 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65540</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty order as not barred by limitation under Section 275(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, but deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) due to the assessee&#039;s claim being made in good faith and all relevant particulars being disclosed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>