<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 260 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under s. 271(1)(c) for claiming exemption under s. 10(23G) without the necessary approval from the Central Government. The assessee, an infrastructure capital company, demonstrated a bona fide belief in obtaining approval and substantiated their efforts through submitted documents. As the explanation provided was deemed genuine, the penalty for concealment of income was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 260 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under s. 271(1)(c) for claiming exemption under s. 10(23G) without the necessary approval from the Central Government. The assessee, an infrastructure capital company, demonstrated a bona fide belief in obtaining approval and substantiated their efforts through submitted documents. As the explanation provided was deemed genuine, the penalty for concealment of income was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>