<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 348 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65529</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the AO to recompute depreciation on a car sold during the year in accordance with provisions of s. 32(1) and s. 43(6)(c) of the IT Act, 1961. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in the treatment of the sold asset and emphasized the importance of correctly applying depreciation rules for determining taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 348 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65529</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the AO to recompute depreciation on a car sold during the year in accordance with provisions of s. 32(1) and s. 43(6)(c) of the IT Act, 1961. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in the treatment of the sold asset and emphasized the importance of correctly applying depreciation rules for determining taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>