<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 311 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65526</link>
    <description>Employer-borne tax under an employment agreement was treated as part of salary, and multiple-stage grossing up was accepted as the correct method for computing taxable salary income. The analysis distinguished presumptive business income cases and reasoned that, for salary, the employer&#039;s undertaking covered the employee&#039;s tax liability itself. Section 10(10CC) was read as applying only to a non-monetary perquisite, so tax paid by the employer on behalf of the employee remained a monetary payment forming part of salary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:37:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 311 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65526</link>
      <description>Employer-borne tax under an employment agreement was treated as part of salary, and multiple-stage grossing up was accepted as the correct method for computing taxable salary income. The analysis distinguished presumptive business income cases and reasoned that, for salary, the employer&#039;s undertaking covered the employee&#039;s tax liability itself. Section 10(10CC) was read as applying only to a non-monetary perquisite, so tax paid by the employer on behalf of the employee remained a monetary payment forming part of salary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>