<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 240 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65522</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the deduction of Rs. 1,000 per month per child under Rule 3(5) of the Income-tax Rules is only applicable if the cost of education does not exceed Rs. 1,000. The cost of education for tax purposes should include all expenses except for depreciation. The appeals were allowed, directing the Assessing Officer to consider any objections to the computation of cost or perquisite value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 240 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65522</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the deduction of Rs. 1,000 per month per child under Rule 3(5) of the Income-tax Rules is only applicable if the cost of education does not exceed Rs. 1,000. The cost of education for tax purposes should include all expenses except for depreciation. The appeals were allowed, directing the Assessing Officer to consider any objections to the computation of cost or perquisite value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>