<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 189 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the determination of Rs. 1,50,39,137 as undisclosed income (UDI), the addition of Rs. 1,78,204 for commission paid, and the charging of interest under section 158BFA. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, directing the exclusion of UDI from the regular assessment, and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:15:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 189 - ITAT DELHI-H</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the determination of Rs. 1,50,39,137 as undisclosed income (UDI), the addition of Rs. 1,78,204 for commission paid, and the charging of interest under section 158BFA. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, directing the exclusion of UDI from the regular assessment, and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>