<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 259 - ITAT DELHI-G</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65506</link>
    <description>A provident fund established under a scheme framed under the Employees&#039; Provident Fund Act, 1952 falls within the inclusive definition of &quot;recognised provident fund&quot; in section 2(38) of the Income-tax Act, so separate recognition by the Chief CIT or CIT is not a condition precedent. On that basis, income received by trustees on behalf of such a fund is exempt under section 10(25), and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 259 - ITAT DELHI-G</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65506</link>
      <description>A provident fund established under a scheme framed under the Employees&#039; Provident Fund Act, 1952 falls within the inclusive definition of &quot;recognised provident fund&quot; in section 2(38) of the Income-tax Act, so separate recognition by the Chief CIT or CIT is not a condition precedent. On that basis, income received by trustees on behalf of such a fund is exempt under section 10(25), and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>