<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 403 - ITAT DELHI-G</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the perquisite value should be assessed based on the date when the option to acquire shares was exercised, i.e., 30th April, 1999, and not on the date of the offer. The decision stressed the significance of determining income in the appropriate assessment year in accordance with the IT Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 403 - ITAT DELHI-G</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the perquisite value should be assessed based on the date when the option to acquire shares was exercised, i.e., 30th April, 1999, and not on the date of the offer. The decision stressed the significance of determining income in the appropriate assessment year in accordance with the IT Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>