<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 402 - ITAT DELHI-G</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Rs. 10.65 crores received by the assessee was a loan for setting up a software development facility and not a trade advance. The forfeiture of this amount did not transform it into taxable income under Section 28 of the IT Act. The Tribunal reversed the orders of the AO and CIT(A), deleting the addition of Rs. 10.65 crores and allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 402 - ITAT DELHI-G</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Rs. 10.65 crores received by the assessee was a loan for setting up a software development facility and not a trade advance. The forfeiture of this amount did not transform it into taxable income under Section 28 of the IT Act. The Tribunal reversed the orders of the AO and CIT(A), deleting the addition of Rs. 10.65 crores and allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>