<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 325 - ITAT DELHI-G</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow deletion of development expenses as revenue expenditure, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the disallowance under r. 6D by combining all employee journeys and excluding certain expenses, aligning with earlier decisions in favor of the assessee. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the recomputation of disallowance under r. 6D was also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:56:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 325 - ITAT DELHI-G</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow deletion of development expenses as revenue expenditure, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the disallowance under r. 6D by combining all employee journeys and excluding certain expenses, aligning with earlier decisions in favor of the assessee. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the recomputation of disallowance under r. 6D was also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>