<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 307 - ITAT DELHI-G</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65437</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow 100% depreciation on tankers and the depreciation claim on wind electricity generators for the assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the assessee was entitled to the depreciation claims based on the evidence presented regarding the ownership and commissioning of the assets in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 307 - ITAT DELHI-G</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65437</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow 100% depreciation on tankers and the depreciation claim on wind electricity generators for the assessment years 1996-97 and 1997-98. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the assessee was entitled to the depreciation claims based on the evidence presented regarding the ownership and commissioning of the assets in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>