<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 226 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for clarification on the tax treatment of the keyman insurance policy&#039;s maturity value post-assignment. The contradictory information from LIC led to the Tribunal directing a fresh decision based on the policy&#039;s terms and conditions, excluding the impact of loans and interest on the maturity value. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, awaiting the AO&#039;s revised determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 226 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for clarification on the tax treatment of the keyman insurance policy&#039;s maturity value post-assignment. The contradictory information from LIC led to the Tribunal directing a fresh decision based on the policy&#039;s terms and conditions, excluding the impact of loans and interest on the maturity value. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, awaiting the AO&#039;s revised determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>