<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 326 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65408</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1997-98. The CIT(A) found no justification for the concealment penalty, citing lack of proper opportunities given by the AO and lack of clear evidence of concealment. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting the absence of clear satisfaction of concealment in the assessment order as required by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:13:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 326 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65408</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1997-98. The CIT(A) found no justification for the concealment penalty, citing lack of proper opportunities given by the AO and lack of clear evidence of concealment. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting the absence of clear satisfaction of concealment in the assessment order as required by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>