<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 236 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65397</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment by the AO in Ghaziabad, finding that the notice issued under section 148 of the IT Act lacked jurisdiction since the assessee was regularly assessed in New Delhi. The notice was deemed invalid as it was issued after the statutory time limit. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the addition of capital gains was dismissed, as the assessment itself was invalidated on jurisdictional grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 236 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65397</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment by the AO in Ghaziabad, finding that the notice issued under section 148 of the IT Act lacked jurisdiction since the assessee was regularly assessed in New Delhi. The notice was deemed invalid as it was issued after the statutory time limit. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the addition of capital gains was dismissed, as the assessment itself was invalidated on jurisdictional grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>