<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 213 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65387</link>
    <description>The ITAT concluded that the CIT improperly exercised revisionary powers under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It determined that the assessment orders were neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the revenue. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had adequately examined the issues, and the CIT&#039;s differing view did not justify invoking section 263. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, affirming the validity of the original assessment orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 213 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65387</link>
      <description>The ITAT concluded that the CIT improperly exercised revisionary powers under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It determined that the assessment orders were neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the revenue. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had adequately examined the issues, and the CIT&#039;s differing view did not justify invoking section 263. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, affirming the validity of the original assessment orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>