<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 224 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65384</link>
    <description>An assessment completed by an Additional Commissioner was invalid because he was not shown to have been authorised by a specific written order and was not otherwise treated as an Assessing Officer. The exhaustive definition of &quot;Assessing Officer&quot; did not itself include the Additional Commissioner, and jurisdiction could arise only through a written authorisation under the statute. A general administrative clarification could not replace the statutory requirement of a formal order in writing. Since statutory powers must be exercised in the prescribed manner, the assessment lacked valid jurisdiction and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 224 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65384</link>
      <description>An assessment completed by an Additional Commissioner was invalid because he was not shown to have been authorised by a specific written order and was not otherwise treated as an Assessing Officer. The exhaustive definition of &quot;Assessing Officer&quot; did not itself include the Additional Commissioner, and jurisdiction could arise only through a written authorisation under the statute. A general administrative clarification could not replace the statutory requirement of a formal order in writing. Since statutory powers must be exercised in the prescribed manner, the assessment lacked valid jurisdiction and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>