<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 229 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals concerning the tax liability on ocean freight and inland haulage charges. It concluded that the inland haulage charges fell under section 172(8) of the IT Act, exempting them from TDS under section 194C. The Tribunal found the CIT(A) correctly interpreted the law, determining the assessee was not in default regarding TDS obligations. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of legal provisions and the case&#039;s factual circumstances, affirming that charges paid to shipping agents of non-resident ship owners were outside the purview of section 194C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 229 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals concerning the tax liability on ocean freight and inland haulage charges. It concluded that the inland haulage charges fell under section 172(8) of the IT Act, exempting them from TDS under section 194C. The Tribunal found the CIT(A) correctly interpreted the law, determining the assessee was not in default regarding TDS obligations. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of legal provisions and the case&#039;s factual circumstances, affirming that charges paid to shipping agents of non-resident ship owners were outside the purview of section 194C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>