<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 202 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65372</link>
    <description>The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, determining that the transactions between the deductor company and manufacturers/vendors were sales, not works contracts under Section 194C of the IT Act, 1961. The manufacturers were deemed independent entities, responsible for raw materials and production quality. The goods had commercial value, and relevant CBDT circulars and judicial precedents supported this view, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 202 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65372</link>
      <description>The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, determining that the transactions between the deductor company and manufacturers/vendors were sales, not works contracts under Section 194C of the IT Act, 1961. The manufacturers were deemed independent entities, responsible for raw materials and production quality. The goods had commercial value, and relevant CBDT circulars and judicial precedents supported this view, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>