<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 201 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65371</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding deductions under Sections 80-IA and 80HHC. It upheld that units should be treated independently for Section 80-IA deductions, with proportional allocation of head office expenses and no adjustment of brought forward losses. For Section 80HHC, the Tribunal supported excluding excise duty from total turnover and excluding share business losses, aligning with relevant High Court judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 201 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65371</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding deductions under Sections 80-IA and 80HHC. It upheld that units should be treated independently for Section 80-IA deductions, with proportional allocation of head office expenses and no adjustment of brought forward losses. For Section 80HHC, the Tribunal supported excluding excise duty from total turnover and excluding share business losses, aligning with relevant High Court judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>