<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 192 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65329</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision to sustain the addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, based on disparities in valuation reports and construction types. The appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding no grounds for interference and supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:24:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 192 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65329</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision to sustain the addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, based on disparities in valuation reports and construction types. The appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding no grounds for interference and supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>