<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 191 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by characterizing interest income from IDBI Bonds as &quot;income from other sources&quot; instead of business income. However, the decisions to allow travelling expenses of the partner and disallow car expenses for personal use were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:21:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 191 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by characterizing interest income from IDBI Bonds as &quot;income from other sources&quot; instead of business income. However, the decisions to allow travelling expenses of the partner and disallow car expenses for personal use were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>