<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 300 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assesses, remitting the matter to the AO to grant appropriate relief under section 112(1) of the Income Tax Act. The rejection of the application under section 154 was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the correct application of tax rates based on the chosen benefit of indexation or under the proviso to section 112(1) for long-term capital gains on the sale of shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:08:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 300 - ITAT DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assesses, remitting the matter to the AO to grant appropriate relief under section 112(1) of the Income Tax Act. The rejection of the application under section 154 was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the correct application of tax rates based on the chosen benefit of indexation or under the proviso to section 112(1) for long-term capital gains on the sale of shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>