<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 438 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65291</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the authorities erred in treating the return as non est during the period of irregularity. The Tribunal decided that the assessee was eligible for interest under Section 244A for the relevant period, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 438 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65291</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, holding that the authorities erred in treating the return as non est during the period of irregularity. The Tribunal decided that the assessee was eligible for interest under Section 244A for the relevant period, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>