<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 285 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65287</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and dismissed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, restoring the AO&#039;s orders on various issues related to the computation of perquisite values for rent-free accommodation, non-monetary perquisites, social security contributions, and tax borne by the employer. The Tribunal upheld the initiation of proceedings under Section 148 of the IT Act, finding that income had indeed escaped assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 285 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65287</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and dismissed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, restoring the AO&#039;s orders on various issues related to the computation of perquisite values for rent-free accommodation, non-monetary perquisites, social security contributions, and tax borne by the employer. The Tribunal upheld the initiation of proceedings under Section 148 of the IT Act, finding that income had indeed escaped assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>