<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 418 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for clarity on the purchase details to determine the application of section 92 accurately. The case highlights the importance of establishing the arm&#039;s length nature of transactions with associated enterprises and the significance of providing clear and timely information for tax assessments under section 92 of the IT Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 418 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for clarity on the purchase details to determine the application of section 92 accurately. The case highlights the importance of establishing the arm&#039;s length nature of transactions with associated enterprises and the significance of providing clear and timely information for tax assessments under section 92 of the IT Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>