<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 266 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) by the Assessing Officer. The penalty proceedings were deemed invalid due to the lack of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer for penalty initiation. Additionally, the Tribunal held that penalty cannot be imposed on a negative income without tax payable, following the legal position established by the Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court and affirmed by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:25:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 266 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) by the Assessing Officer. The penalty proceedings were deemed invalid due to the lack of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer for penalty initiation. Additionally, the Tribunal held that penalty cannot be imposed on a negative income without tax payable, following the legal position established by the Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court and affirmed by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>