<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 245 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65257</link>
    <description>Supervisory activities carried on in connection with an installation or assembly project can create a service permanent establishment under the relevant DTAA clause even when the project does not belong to the non-resident, provided the six-month threshold is met. Control or ownership of the site is not a necessary condition. Once the treaty exemption for fees for technical services does not apply, the income attributable to the permanent establishment is computed under article 7 and the applicable domestic provisions for the relevant period, with no deduction of expenditure under section 44D(b) and tax charged at 30 per cent under section 115A; section 44DA was held inapplicable for that assessment period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 245 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65257</link>
      <description>Supervisory activities carried on in connection with an installation or assembly project can create a service permanent establishment under the relevant DTAA clause even when the project does not belong to the non-resident, provided the six-month threshold is met. Control or ownership of the site is not a necessary condition. Once the treaty exemption for fees for technical services does not apply, the income attributable to the permanent establishment is computed under article 7 and the applicable domestic provisions for the relevant period, with no deduction of expenditure under section 44D(b) and tax charged at 30 per cent under section 115A; section 44DA was held inapplicable for that assessment period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>