<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 145 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65252</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty order, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It concluded that penalty proceedings were validly initiated during the assessment proceedings, the assessee was not deprived of an opportunity to be heard, settlement did not preclude penalty imposition, and mens rea and reasonable cause were not relevant for penalty under Section 273(2)(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 145 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65252</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty order, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It concluded that penalty proceedings were validly initiated during the assessment proceedings, the assessee was not deprived of an opportunity to be heard, settlement did not preclude penalty imposition, and mens rea and reasonable cause were not relevant for penalty under Section 273(2)(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>