<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 169 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding penalties under s. 272A(2)(g) of the Act for delayed TDS certificates. It was held that the penalty should not exceed the total TDS amount involved in the delayed certificates, especially if there was a reasonable cause for the delay. The Tribunal found that the delay was not intentional, considering timely tax deductions and payments, as well as the absence of complaints from certificate recipients. As such, the sustained penalty was deemed unjustified and canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:35:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 169 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding penalties under s. 272A(2)(g) of the Act for delayed TDS certificates. It was held that the penalty should not exceed the total TDS amount involved in the delayed certificates, especially if there was a reasonable cause for the delay. The Tribunal found that the delay was not intentional, considering timely tax deductions and payments, as well as the absence of complaints from certificate recipients. As such, the sustained penalty was deemed unjustified and canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>